inconvenient facts

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home about 9/11 & the Perpetual War
... about 9/11 and the Perpetual War

War Crimes and 9/11: Why Dick and Don Are Suspects

User Rating: / 47

Bush_CheneyrumsfeldRichard Clarke, the former counterterrorism official, has recently come out suggesting that George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld should be charged with war crimes. Unfortunately, media outlets reporting this story have failed to examine Clarke’s long relationship to Cheney and Rumsfeld and his record of having prevented the capture of Osama bin Laden. These omissions highlight that, although Cheney and Rumsfeld undoubtedly are guilty of post-9/11 war crimes, suspicions that they helped create the pretext for those crimes go unreported.



The Unspoken Truth on 9/11:

User Rating: / 1

911towers911 Movie: "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor"

There have been several good films and videos about 9/11. But the new film by award-winning film-maker Massimo Mazzucco is in a class by itself.

For those of us who have been working on 9/11 for a long time, this is the film we have been waiting for.

Whereas there are excellent films treating the falsity of particular parts of the official account, such as the Twin Towers or WTC 7, Mazzucco has given us a comprehensive documentary treatment of 9/11, dealing with virtually all of the issues.

There have, of course, been films that treated the fictional official story as true. And there are films that use fictional stories to portray people’s struggles after starting to suspect the official story to be false.

But there is no fiction in Mazzucco’s film – except in the sense that it clearly and relentlessly exposes every part of the official account as fictional.


The War on Terrorism … or whatever.

User Rating: / 128

“U.S. hopes of winning more influence over Syria’s divided rebel movement faded Wednesday after 11 of the biggest armed factions repudiated the Western-backed political opposition coalition and announced the formation of an alliance dedicated to creating an Islamist state. The al-Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra, designated a terrorist organization by the United States, is the lead signatory of the new group.” 1

pipelinesoldiersPity the poor American who wants to be a good citizen, wants to understand the world and his country’s role in it, wants to believe in the War on Terrorism, wants to believe that his government seeks to do good … What is he to make of all this?


The 911 Truth Movement Goes to Court in the UK.

AE911Truth Evidence Goes to Court Feb 25, 2013

911columnOn February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.

Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.


The 9/11 Plan:

Cheney, Rumsfeld and the “Continuity of Government”

Rumsfeld“If a mandarinate ruled America, the recruiting committee on September 11 would have had to find someone like Cheney.” Washington Post author Barton Gellman in his book “Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency”

Terrorism. Emergency plans. Political careers. The history of 9/11 can be written from many angles.

But whatever point of view is chosen, Dick Cheney is a central figure. “Principle is okay up to a certain point”, he once said, “but principle doesn´t do any good if you lose the nomination”. He´s surely an elusive character. Not less than Donald Rumsfeld, his close companion. Both of their lifes are inseperably bound with a dark side of recent American history. The core of the following story was originally told by the authors James Mann and Peter Dale Scott whose thorough research is deeply appreciated. Yet a lot of background information was added. Thus a bigger picture slowly took shape, showing a plan and its actors …


Where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio?

william_blum"France no longer recognizes its children," lamented Guillaume Roquette in an editorial in the Figaro weekly magazine in Paris. "How can the country of Victor Hugo, secularism and family reunions produce jihadists capable of attacking a kosher grocery store?" 1

I ask: How can the country of Henry David Thoreau, separation of church and state, and family Thanksgiving dinners produce American super-nationalists capable of firing missiles into Muslim family reunions in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia?

Does America recognize its children? Indeed, it honors them. Constantly.


“Wiping Countries Off the Map”:

User Rating: / 63

Who’s Failing the “Failed States”

Washington is in the "business of destroying" a very long list of countries.

 us_soldiers_in_battle“Across the world, a dangerous rumor has spread that could have catastrophic implications. According to legend, Iran’s President has threatened to destroy Israel, or, to quote the misquote, “Israel must be wiped off the map”. Contrary to popular belief, this statement was never made, …” (Arash Norouzi, Wiped off The Map: The Rumor of the Century January 2007)

The United States has attacked, directly or indirectly, some 44 countries throughout the world since August 1945, a number of them many times. The avowed objective of these military interventions has been to effect “regime change”. The cloaks of “human rights” and of “democracy” were invariably evoked to justify what were unilateral and illegal acts. (Professor Eric Waddell, The United States’ Global Military Crusade (1945- ), Global Research, February 2007


Reining in Obama and His Drones

Armed_DroneBarack Obama, former president of the Harvard Law Review and a constitutional law lecturer, should go back and review his coursework. He seems to have declined to comport his presidency to the rule of law.

Let’s focus here on his major expansion of drone warfare in defiance of international law, statutory law and the Constitution. Obama’s drones roam over multiple nations of Asia and Africa and target suspects, both known and unknown, whom the president, in his unbridled discretion, wants to evaporate for the cause of national security.


September 11, 2001:

 The Crimes of War Committed “in the Name of 9/11?

 Initiating a Legal Procedure against the Perpetrators of 9/11

michel chossudovskyMichel Chossudovsky

International Conference on “9/11 Revisited – Seeking the Truth”

Perdana Global Peace Foundation (PGPF)

Kuala Lumpur, November 2012


The tragic events of September 11, 2001 constitute a fundamental landmark in American history, a decisive watershed, a breaking point.

Millions of people have been misled regarding the causes and consequences of 9/11.


Launching the U.S. Terror War: the CIA, 9/11, Afghanistan, and Central Asia1

User Rating: / 81

The engineering of a series of provocations to justify military intervention is feasible and could be accomplished with the resources available. - Report of May 1963 to Joint Chiefs of Staff1

Bush’s Terror War and the Fixing of Intelligence

9-11 Thermite ColumnOn September 11, 2001, within hours of the murderous 9/11 attacks, Bush, Rumsfeld, and Cheney had committed America to what they later called the “War on Terror.” It should more properly, I believe, be called the “Terror War,” one in which terror has been directed repeatedly against civilians by all participants, both states and non-state actors. It should also be seen as part of a larger, indeed global, process in which terror has been used against civilians in interrelated campaigns by all major powers, including China in Xinjiang and Russia in Chechnya, as well as the United States.2 Terror war in its global context should perhaps be seen as the latest stage of the age-long secular spread of transurban civilization into areas of mostly rural resistance -- areas where conventional forms of warfare, for either geographic or cultural reasons, prove inconclusive.


The United States and its Comrade-In-Arms, Al Qaeda.

User Rating: / 46

And Other Tales of an Empire Gone Mad.

Got Security?Afghanistan in the 1980s and 90s ... Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s ... Libya 2011 ... Syria 2012 ... In military conflicts in each of these countries the United States and al Qaeda (or one of its associates) have been on the same side. 1

What does this tell us about the United States' "War On Terrorism"?

Regime change has been the American goal on each occasion: overthrowing communists (or "communists"), Serbians, Slobodan Milosevic, Moammar Gaddafi, Bashar al-Assad ... all heretics or infidels, all non-believers in the empire, all inconvenient to the empire.

Why, if the enemy is Islamic terrorism, has the United States invested so much blood and treasure against the PLO, Iraq, and Libya, and now Syria, all mideast secular governments?



User Rating: / 68

Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons in the Age of Nuclear War

Global Research Editor's Note: This carefully researched article by Amy Worthington was first published by Global Research in June 2004 ( We are reposting it with a view to encouraging debate on the issue of Chemtrails

ChemtrailsNorth America is now suffering its seventh year of conspicuous and dangerous aerosol and electromagnetic operations conducted by the U.S. government under the guise of national security. Concerned citizens watch in fear as military tankers discolor the skies with toxic chemicals that morph into synthetic clouds.

We continually witness bizarre meteorological occurrences as powerful electromagnetic devices manipulate both the jet stream and individual storm fronts to create artificial weather and climatic conditions. Black operations projects embedded within these aerosol missions are documented to sicken and disorient select populations with biological test agents and psychotronic mind/mood control technologies.

Death of the US Constitution:

User Rating: / 44
Can Americans Escape the Deception?

We The People Hot Air Day is upon us. On July 4 hot air will spew forth all over the country as dignitaries deliver homilies to our “freedom and democracy” and praise “our brave troops” who are protecting our freedom by “killing them over there before they come over here.”

Not a single one of these speeches will contain one word of truth. No speaker will lament the death of the US Constitution or urge his audience to action to restore the only document that protects their liberty. No speaker will acknowledge that in the 21st century the Bush/Obama Regime, with the complicity of the Department of Justice, federal courts, Congress, presstitute media, law schools, bar associations, and an insouciant public have murdered the Constitution in the name of the “war on terror.”

As in medieval times, American citizens can be thrown into dungeons and never accounted for. No evidence or charges need be presented to a court. No trial is required, and no conviction.

Bilderberg Plan to Force NATO’s Turkey Into Syrian War

F-4 PhantomLast Friday saw a Turkish combat jet downed in the Mediterranean Sea by Syrian antiaircraft batteries. Syria insists that Turkey’s F-4 Phantom was shot down inside Syrian airspace.

It appears to be a Neo-Ottoman baiting exercise by NATO, and for all intents and purposes, it has worked - so far.

Regardless of the facts surrounding this event, the Western media machine and political operators will seek to quickly leverage this event in their efforts to move their inevitable Syrian bombardment project forward.

To date, NATO’s role for Turkey has been to remain in the shadows, hosting the Syrian National Council, coordinating arms shipments in Syria for foreign fighters, and giving refuge to al-Qaeda rebels across Turkey’s border with Syria. But this latest jet incident is likely to change all that.




Those Laboratory Mice Were Children...

Editor's Note: excerpt

Man Was Made to Mourn     by Robert Burns (1759-1796) 

One among an unusually high number of children in Basra fighting leukaemia. / Credit:Karlos Zurutuza/IPS."Many and sharp the numerous ills,
Inwoven with our frame!
More pointed still we make ourselves,
Regret, remorse, and shame!
And man, whose heaven-erected face
The smiles of love adorn,
Man's inhumanity to man
Makes countless thousands mourn!

One among an unusually high number of children in Basra fighting leukaemia. Credit:Karlos Zurutuza/IPS.
Buy this picture

FALLUJAH, Iraq, Apr 13, 2012 (IPS) - At Fallujah hospital they cannot offer any statistics on children born with birth defects – there are just too many. Parents don’t want to talk. "Families bury their newborn babies after they die without telling anyone," says hospital spokesman Nadim al-Hadidi. "It’s all too shameful for them."

Murder Is Legal,

Says US Attorney General Eric Holder

Eric Holder at diasAttorney General Eric Holder on Monday explained why it's legal to murder people -- not to execute prisoners convicted of capital crimes, not to shoot someone in self-defense, not to fight on a battlefield in a war that is somehow legalized, but to target and kill an individual sitting on his sofa, with no charges, no arrest, no trial, no approval from a court, no approval from a legislature, no approval from we the people, and in fact no sharing of information with any institutions that are not the president. Holder's speech approached his topic in a round about manner:

"Since this country’s earliest days, the American people have risen to this challenge – and all that it demands. But, as we have seen – and as President John F. Kennedy may have described best – 'In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.'"


IRAN: The Next War on Washington’s Agenda Politics

US Carrier at seaOnly the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to attack Iran. According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky, “Active war preparations directed against Iran (with the involvement of Israel and NATO) were initiated in May 2003.”

Washington has deployed missiles directed at Iran in its oil emirate puppet states, Oman and the UAE, and little doubt in the other US puppet states in the Middle East. Washington has beefed up Saudi Arabia’s jet fighter force. Most recently, Washington has deployed 9,000 US troops to Israel to participate in “war games” designed to test the US/Israeli air defense system. As Iran represents no threat unless attacked, Washington’s war preparations signal Washington’s intention to attack Iran.

Another signal that Washington has a new war on its agenda is the raised level of Washington’s rhetoric and demonization of Iran. Judging by polls Washington’s propaganda that Iran is threatening the US by developing a nuclear weapon has met with success. Half of the American public support a military attack on Iran in order to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear capability. Those of us who are trying to awaken our fellow citizens start from a deficit that the minds of half of the US population are under Big Brother’s control.


Too Big To Cover Up?

User Rating: / 55
The Legend of 9/11
9-11_thermite1In the early days of my assertion that 9/11 was an “Inside Job”, amongst the sneering and disbelief, this statement (or something to its effect) was often made,

“There is no way something that big could be covered up! There would have to be to many people involved and there is no way it wouldn’t get out!”

Basically the implication was that I was a nut. I have actually lost friends over this topic. Fortunately, although I may very well be a nut, people are speaking out and have been for a very long time. The problem is they are not being heard. 

The IMF and US African Command (AFRICOM) Join Hands in the Plunder of the African Continent

Lagos Dissents Under IMF Hegemony

Nigeria: The Next Front for AFRICOM

AFRICOM MapOn a recent trip to West Africa, the newly appointed managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde ordered the governments of Nigeria, Guinea, Cameroon, Ghana and Chad to relinquish vital fuel subsidies. Much to the dismay of the population of these nations, the prices of fuel and transport have near tripled over night without notice, causing widespread violence on the streets of the Nigerian capital of Abuja and its economic center, Lagos. Much like the IMF induced riots in Indonesia during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, public discontent in Nigeria is channelled towards an incompetent and self-serving domestic elite, compliant to the interests of fraudulent foreign institutions.

Although Nigeria holds the most proven oil reserves in Africa behind Libya, it’s people are now expected to pay a fee closer to what the average American pays for the cost of fuel, an exorbitant sum in contrast to its regional neighbours. Alternatively, other oil producing nations such as Venezuela, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia offer their populations fuel for as little as $0.12 USD per gallon. While Lagos has one of Africa’s highest concentration of billionaires, the vast majority of the population struggle daily on less than $2.00 USD. Amid a staggering 47% youth unemployment rate and thousands of annual deaths related to preventable diseases, the IMF has pulled the rug out from under a nation where safe drinking water is a luxury to around 80% of it’s populace.


Why Not Attack Iran?

Iran will retaliate against U.S. troops and Israel

Don't Iraq Iran picture comparision


he push to attack Iran has been on for so long that entire categories of arguments for it (such as that the Iranians are fueling the Iraqi resistance) have come and gone.

At we've been collecting the arguments for and against attacking Iran for years. We've campaigned against an attack, but never been able to claim a success, because decisions not to launch wars are never announced, because those pushing for wars never give up, and because those believing what their government tells them think the Pentagon never campaigns for wars but is forced into them defensively on short notice by attacks from evildoers.

While Iran has not attacked any other country in centuries, the United States has not done so well from Iran's standpoint.


Fallujah Remembered By A US Marine Who Helped Destroy It In 2004

US Marine Ross Caputi reflects on Fallujah in Iraq, where he was deployed in the 2004 attack that killed thousands, displaced hundreds of thousands more and poisoned the city with chemical weapons.

fallujah_2004_400It has been seven years since the 2nd siege of Fallujah -- the American assault that left the city in ruins, killed thousands of civilians, and displaced hundreds-of-thousands more -- the assault that poisoned a generation, plaguing the people who live there with cancers and their children with birth defects.

It has been seven years and the lies that justified the assault still perpetuate false beliefs about what we did.

The American veterans who fought there still do not understand who they fought against, or what they were fighting for.

I know, because I am one of those American veterans. In the eyes of many of the people I "served" with, the people of Fallujah remain dehumanized and their resistance fighters are still believed to be terrorists. But unlike most of my counterparts, I understand that I was the aggressor, and that the resistance fighters in Fallujah were defending their city.


Congresswoman Lee Introduces Bill to Repeal the Authorization to Use Military Force

Congresswoman Barbara Lee,
like Jeanette Rankin before her, bravely stood alone in Congress against a vote
for war, the vote in 2001 for the so-called Authorization to Use Military Force,
a Constitutionally dubious passing of the war decision buck to President Bush
and his successors.  A majority of Americans now believes that the Afghanistan
War that followed that authorization never should have been begun and should, in
fact, be ended.  So, the Congresswoman, along with initial cosponsors Jones,
Woolsey, Grijalva, Conyers, and Honda, is offering us a second chance, a chance
to get our response to 9-11 right, to restore war powers to the Congress, and to
impose the will of the people on that body.

Congresswoman Lee has sent her
colleagues this letter, which we should each send them ourselves by email, fax,
phone, carrier pigeon, and by nailing it to their cathedral

"Dear Colleague:

join me as an original cosponsor of the 'Repeal of the Authorization for Use of
Military Force Act of 2011.'  This legislation repeals the joint resolution
providing overly-broad authorization to the President to use all necessary and
appropriate force against those involved in attacking our nation and to prevent
any future acts of international terrorism against the United

broad authorization of force has had far-reaching implications which shake the
very foundations of our great nation and democracy. It has been used to justify
warrantless surveillance and wiretapping activities, indefinite detention
practices that fly in the face of our constitutional values, extrajudicial
targeted-killing operations, and an ever-growing and indefinite pursuit of an
ill-defined enemy abroad.

"We must
repeal this authorization for use of military force, end the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and re-focus our energy and efforts into those actions which truly
improve our national security, including developing emerging economies and
diplomatic efforts.  Please join me as an original cosponsor of this legislation
to remove this overly-broad blank check for war anytime, anywhere. 

Member of Congress"

The legislation itself is shorter than the above letter, powerful in
its simplicity, approaching in fact the populist wisdom of the long-forgotten
Kellogg-Briand Pact, and offering far more than a technical readjustment within
a government rotten to its core.  At the risk of revitalizing the utterly
discredited and poisonous notions of hope and change, I would suggest that this
bill offers the nearest possible approximation of the time-altering repeal, not
of a law, but of the past decade of collective insanity and self-righteous
mass-murder.  Read this carefully:

To repeal Public Law
Ms. LEE of California introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on _______
To repeal Public Law 107–40.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress

This Act may be cited as the
‘‘Repeal of the Authorization for Use of Military Force’’.

SEC. 2.
Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of
Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), signed into law on
September 18, 2001, has been used to justify a broad and open-ended
authorization for the use of military force and such an interpretation is
inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and make all laws for
executing powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United

Effective 180 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Authorization for Use of Military
Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby

The AUMF is to be repealed here for two reasons: because Congress is
Constitutionally bound to decide matters of war and cannot legally hand off that
responsibility to its executive, and because Congresswoman Lee's tearful
predictions when she stood alone against this madness a decade ago, and was
subsequently obliged to hire security protection, have been proved right; the
Authorization has been used and abused to an ever greater extent as an
aggrandizement of executive power and a justification for the erosion of our
civil liberties.  This proposal comes on the heels of a successful public push
by, the ACLU, and others to strip out of the 2012 Defense
Authorization Act language that would have radically expanded, rather than
repealed, the 2001 AUMF.

Of course, the sponsorship
of this proposal by a handful of Congress Members, any number of them capable of
losing their spine at the command of their parties' leaders, does not suggest
the likelihood of quick passage.  But it does give a somewhat floundering peace
movement a point around which to rally, educate, organize, and pressure.  Rather
than joining Congressional progressives in lobbying the 12-member Super
Congress, even for top priorities like ending the wars and moving the money to
human needs, rather than focusing purely on appealing to an all-powerful
president to end particular wars (important as that is), we have an opportunity
here to shift the country away from both the idea of presidential war making and
the idea, recognized now even by the Washington Post, of war without
end, war as normality, with peace having become the state of affairs requiring
particular justification.

As popular movements begin to bring nonviolent resistance to
Washington, D.C., including this October ( ) perhaps one
appropriate measure would be the shutting down of the congressional offices of
each member who has not yet joined the good Congresswoman from Oakland on this
bill -- a step I'm sure she would never recommend to us and which it is not her
role to recommend to us, but a step which morality requires of us as clearly as
the blood of our innocent victims is crying out from continents day after

David Swanson is the
author of "War Is A Lie"

afghanistan_war cropCongresswoman Barbara Lee, like Jeanette Rankin before her, bravely stood alone in Congress against a vote for war, the vote in 2001 for the so-called Authorization to Use Military Force, a Constitutionally dubious passing of the war decision buck to President Bush and his successors. A majority of Americans now believes that the Afghanistan War that followed that authorization never should have been begun and should, in fact, be ended. So, the Congresswoman, along with initial cosponsors Jones, Woolsey, Grijalva, Conyers, and Honda, is offering us a second chance, a chance to get our response to 9-11 right, to restore war powers to the Congress, and to impose the will of the people on that body.

Congresswoman Lee has sent her colleagues this letter, which we should each send them ourselves by email, fax, phone, carrier pigeon, and by nailing it to their cathedral doors:


You Only Believe the Official 9/11 Story Because You Don't Know the Official 9/11 Story

I don't believe the official story of 9/11 because I know the
official story of 9/11!
I don't believe the official story of 9/11 because I know the official story of 9/11!
911towersDuring the past 10 years I have not met a single individual who, after doing research on the subjectpen, switched from questioning the official narrative of the events of 9/11/2001 to believing the official narrative of those events.. It is always the other way around. Why do you think that is? There are good reasons for this, and I will try to explain this phenomenon right now.

The term "conspiracy theorist", perhaps the most misapplied description in our vernacular, is often used to describe 9/11 truthers. Perhaps that term does apply to a segment of the 9/11 truth movement. But in most cases a more accurate description of 9/11 truthers is probably "expert", or "scholar", or "researcher." You see, much of the doubt cast on the official narrative of the events of 9/11 has not come in the form of speculated accusations, or "theories." In fact, it has come in the form of questions that have been raised after a careful study of the official and undisputed events and details.

The New American Century

User Rating: / 43


This documentary, produced by Massimo Mazzucco, provides the missing link for the truth about 9/11. The missing link is MOTIVE. If you cannot imagine why anyone in government would want to cover up essential evidence, then wonder no more. A terrorist attack was exactly what the members of PNAC hoped for to justify a massive military incursion into the Middle East, all of which was planned long before 9/11.

You will witness decades of maneuvering for the control of oil and gas resources and see, first hand, incredible war profits on a scale much greater than ever before in history. Even if you are familiar with some of these events, this is the first time all of them have been brought together in one place.

This is one of the best 9/11 documentaries and everyone should watch it. Please share it.

Watch the Video Here

 Official Website & DVD



Project for A New American Century

User Rating: / 54


<embed src="/public_html/" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>


The Imperial Anatomy of Al-Qaeda.

User Rating: / 4

The CIA’s Drug-Running Terrorists and the “Arc of Crisis”  Part I


As the 9th anniversary of 9/11 nears, and the war on terror continues to be waged and grows in ferocity and geography, it seems all the more imperative to return to the events of that fateful September morning and re-examine the reasons for war and the nature of the stated culprit, Al-Qaeda.


The events of 9/11 pervade the American and indeed the world imagination as an historical myth. The events of that day and those leading up to it remain largely unknown and little understood by the general public, apart from the disturbing images repeated ad nauseam in the media. The facts and troubled truths of that day are lost in the folklore of the 9/11 myth: that the largest attack carried out on American ground was orchestrated by 19 Muslims armed with box cutters and urged on by religious fundamentalism, all under the direction of Osama bin Laden, the leader of a global terrorist network called al-Qaeda, based out of a cave in Afghanistan.


Towards a World War III Scenario?

The Role of Israel in Triggering an Attack on Iran - Part II The Military Road Map

To consult Part I of this essay click below

Preparing for World War III, Targeting Iran
Part I: Global Warfare

mushroomcloudThe stockpiling and deployment of advanced weapons systems directed against Iran started in the immediate wake of the 2003 bombing and invasion of Iraq. From the outset, these war plans were led by the US, in liaison with NATO and Israel.

Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration identified Iran and Syria as the next stage of “the road map to war”. US military sources intimated that an aerial attack on Iran could involve a large scale deployment comparable to the US "shock and awe" bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003:

"American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq.(See Globalsecurity )


Preparing for World War III, Targeting Iran

Part I: Global Warfare

wwIIIHumanity is at a dangerous crossroads. War preparations to attack Iran are in "an advanced state of readiness". Hi tech weapons systems including nuclear warheads are fully deployed.

This military adventure has been on the Pentagon's drawing board since the mid-1990s. First Iraq, then Iran according to a declassified 1995 US Central Command document.


Unusual Trading in Stock Options Prior to 9/11:

Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options

American_United_stocksOn September 19, 2001, CBS reported:

Sources tell CBS News that the afternoon before the attack, alarm bells were sounding over unusual trading in the U.S. stock options market.

An extraordinary number of trades were betting that American Airlines stock price would fall.

The trades are called "puts" and they involved at least 450,000 shares of American. But what raised the red flag is more than 80 percent of the orders were "puts", far outnumbering "call" options, those betting the stock would rise.


Building What?

User Rating: / 73

How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight:

The 9/11 "Official Story" and the Collapse of WTC Building Seven


ashamed_LibertyAt 5:21 PM on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been hit by a plane – a fact that is important because of the widespread acceptance of the idea, in spite of its scientific absurdity, that the Twin Towers collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airliners plus the ensuing jet-fuel-fed fires. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) thereby challenges the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, according to which it was accomplished by al-Qaeda hijackers, even if one accepts the government’s scientifically impossible account of the Twin Towers. This fact was recently emphasized in the title of a review article based on my 2009 book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7,[1] by National Medal of Science-winner Lynn Margulis: “Two Hit, Three Down – The Biggest Lie.”[2]


1. Why the Collapse of WTC 7 Created an Extraordinary Problem


Proof that 9/11 Truthers Are Dangerous

9_11_truthMost Americans don't know what kind of people 9/11 truthers really are.  So they can't figure out whether or not they are dangerous.

Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11. The list proves - once and for all - that people who question 9/11 are dangerous.

Email this list to everyone you know, to prove to them that 9/11 truthers are all dangerous nut cases.


911 Ripple Effect

editor's note: Almost 10 years since 9/11 and we are still at war... The perfect "Perpetual War"

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels, Reichsminister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945.


911 Ripple Effect

911 Ripple Effect champions a very powerful message; backed by expert examination of video evidence and packaged in an imaginative and captivating production that will keep you on the edge of your seats.


Debunking the Debunkers

by Dave vonKleist

The technique employed by mainstream news sources in regard to recent worldwide attention given to “911- IPS – The Directors Cut” has become predictable and expected. “Conspiracy theorists,” “fringe groups,” “right/left wing extremists,” are just a few of the stock labels used to discredit or negate any opinions contrary to the official stories promoted by government officials and mainstream media. In most cases, the offending opinion is ignored and the process of attrition is allowed to run its course until the unapproved notion is forgotten or lapses into obscurity.


Fifty questions on 9/11

User Rating: / 56

911towersIt's September 11 all over again - eight years on. The George W Bush administration is out. The "global war on terror" is still on, renamed "overseas contingency operations" by the Barack Obama administration. Obama's "new strategy" - a war escalation - is in play in AfPak. Osama bin Laden may be dead or not. "Al-Qaeda" remains a catch-all ghost entity. September 11 - the neo-cons' "new Pearl Harbor" - remains the darkest jigsaw puzzle of the young 21st century.


Red Herrings and The “War on Terrorism”

The ironclad bipartisan consensus.

redherringA red herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is used to divert attention from the original issue. The furor over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s knowledge of the Bush/Cheney administration’s use of torture is the latest Washington noise that conveniently diverts attention from the illegitimate “war on terrorism” that continues to serve as the justification for torture, murder and war.


VIDEO: 9/11

User Rating: / 22

911towersHow The WTC Towers Fell

Presentation at the University of Manitoba

Richard Gage will be speaking in Montreal, Saturday, April 18, 2009, at the Centre Saint Pierre, 7pm.


please support truth and purchase a high quality dvd


Active Thermitic Material Discovered:

User Rating: / 20

In Dust From The 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

911columnGlobal Research

Below is the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions of this important and carefully researched article

The complete article can be downloaded (pdf)

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

pp.7-31 (25)

Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

The Open Chemical Physics Journal


Political Leaders for 911 Truth

User Rating: / 1


911towersPolitical Leaders for 9/11 Truth ( is today being launched as the latest formal group calling for a new investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. The organization is headed by Councilor (Senator) Yukihisa Fujita of Japan and former Senator Karen Johnson of Arizona.

This initiative is formed around a petition asking President Obama "to authorize a new, truly independent, investigation to determine what happened on 9/11."


India's 9/11. Who was Behind the Mumbai Attacks?

Washington is Fostering Political Divisions between India and Pakistan

The Mumbai terror attacks were part of a carefully planned and coordinated operation involving several teams of experienced and trained gunmen.


9/11, Deep State Violence and the Hope of Internet Politics

prof.peterdalescottThe Deep State and 9/11

The unthinkable – that elements inside the state would conspire with criminals to kill innocent civilians – has become not only thinkable but commonplace in the last century.